A RESEARCH STORY · 2 MIN READ

What people want from forests: relaxation, air and water

Relaxation, clean air and water retention led the priorities of Czech respondents. Riedl, Němec and colleagues connect public expectations with practical forest planning.

Share on X ↗

Trees surrounded by dense green woodland undergrowth.
Trees and dense green undergrowth. Illustrative photograph from a personal archive.

After a working day, a woodland path can offer a place to unwind. One visitor appreciates the shade; another notices water soaking into the ground after rain. These experiences give forest ecosystem services a tangible meaning and raise a practical question: how can forest stewardship support them?

Which forest benefits do people prioritise?

In a study published in October 2026, Marcel Riedl, Martin Němec and their coauthors drew on a Czech survey conducted from 27 November to 3 December 2025. Computer-assisted personal interviews involved 1,000 adults. Quotas covered sex, age, education, region and municipality size.

Respondents could select up to two benefits of forests and forestry that mattered most to them personally. These were the three most frequently selected options:

Forest benefitShare of respondents
Relaxation and mental well-being53.7%
Clean air and microclimate39.7%
Water retention in the landscape33.2%
Czech survey, 2025; N = 1,000 adults. Shares use all respondents as the denominator; selecting up to two options allows overlap. Source: Riedl et al. (2026), Table 3 and Supplement S4, DOI.

Connecting expectations with management choices

The study proposes a framework connecting ecological processes, management interventions, visitor experiences and governance. For each decision, it helps identify how benefits interact, which information is needed and what should be monitored. Planning can then consider local ecological conditions alongside the ways people use forests and the distribution of management costs.

The authors distinguish four complementary pathways: biophysical relationships between services, interactions mediated by management, benefits experienced together by visitors, and the influence of institutions and incentives. This approach offers a shared language for forest managers, municipalities and the public.

Supporting public forest benefits

75.3% of respondents supported state financial assistance to forest owners for providing public benefits: 29.9% fully agreed and 45.4% rather agreed. The response expresses support for this policy approach. Detailed rules, costs and funding arrangements form the next stage of developing a scheme.

Our introduction to forest ecosystem services explains the different types of benefits. Together, the two perspectives help define stewardship goals that people can recognise in an accessible woodland path, water retained in the landscape and a thriving forest environment.

Sources for this story

2026

Environmental Sciences Europe

Translating forest ecosystem-service interactions into management action: a pathway-based framework illustrated in Czechia and Slovakia

Riedl, M., Němec, M., Sarvašová, Z., Jarský, V., & Sedliak, M. (2026). Translating forest ecosystem-service interactions into management action: a pathway-based framework illustrated in Czechia and Slovakia. Environmental Sciences Europe. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-026-01544-z

DOI 10.1186/s12302-026-01544-z

Share on X ↗

The forest has more stories to tell.

More research stories →

ABOUT THE RESEARCH

Knowledge grows
from long-term research.

This portal explains research on forest ecosystem services and economics at the Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague. It connects everyday experience with original scientific studies.

Co-author of the featured studies
RNDr. Marcel Riedl, CSc.

Scientific guarantor
Ing. et Ing. Martin Němec, Ph.D.